Published On: April 21st 2026 Authored By: Sai Indira G CMRU SOLS Case Details: Citation: 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Justice C.T. Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay KarolDate of Judgment: January 7, 2025 1. Relevant Statutes and Key Provisions The principal legislation involved in this case was the Maintenance and Welfare of […]
Case Summary: Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit Read More »
Published on: 21st April 2026 Authored by: Rubijit Saha Gitarattan International Business School affiliated with GGSIPU Citation: AIR 1997 SC 3011; (1997) 6 SCC 241 Court: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Bench: Chief Justice Jagdish Sharan Verma, Justice Sujata Vasant Manohar, Justice Bhupinder Nath Kirpal Date of Judgement: 13 August 1997 Background of the Case:
CASE SUMMARY: VISHAKA vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (1997) Read More »
Published On: April 21st 2026 Authored By: Anukriti Singh City Law CollegeUniversity of Lucknow Case Details Date of Judgement : 29/10/2025 Name of case: Mohamed Sameer Khan Vs. State represented by Inspector of Police Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 2069 of 2024 Court: Supreme Court Abstract The Supreme Court of India’s decision in Mohamed Sameer Khan
Case Summary: Mohamed Sameer Khan Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police Read More »
Published On: April 21st 2026 Authored By: Rabiya Parveen Law Centre-II, University of Delhi Case Details Case Name: Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India, (2023) 3 SCC 1[1]Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: S.A. Nazeer, B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.Date of Judgment: 2 January 2023Relevant Provisions/Statutes: Section 26(2), Reserve Bank
Case Summary: Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India, (2023) 3 SCC 1 Read More »
Published on: 21st April 2026 Authored by: Akshaya S TNNLU, Trichy Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2025; (Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 4818 of 2023) Court: Supreme Court Date of judgement: 9th December 2025 Bench: Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Manmohan Overview: The Supreme Court of India delivered a vital ruling in the case of Ashok
