Published On: 8th September, 2024 Authored By: Kashish Khanduja University of Petroleum and Energy Studies FACTS The case of Pakala Narayana Swami v King Emperor concerns the discovery of a deceased Indian citizen in a steel trunk found inside a third-class compartment at Puri, the endpoint of a branch line on the Bengal Nagpur railway, […]
Pakala Narayana Swami v. King Emperor AIR 1939 PC 47 Read More »
Published On: 8th September, 2024 Authored By: Abdelrahman Waleed Salama British University In Egypt Fact: In 2009 The government initiated the Aadhar system in Jan of the year 2009 with the aim of building the biggest unique identity system in the world. the Distinctive Identifier for BPL Families project began via the government of India.
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) Vs Union of India Read More »
Published On: 6th September, 2024 Authored By: Lakshmi S Nair Government Law College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala Equivalent Citations: 1950 AIR 124, 1950 SCR 594, AIR 1950 SUPREME COURT 124 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Fazl Ali, Justice Patanjali Sastri, Justice Mahajan, Justice Mukherjea, Justice Das Date of Judgment: May 26, 1950 Facts: Romesh Thappar,
ROMESH THAPPAR V. STATE OF MADRAS Read More »
Published On: 6th September, 2024 Authored By: Palak Duneja Delhi Metropolitan Education Citation: (2023) 9 SCC 322 Bench: Justice K.M Joseph, Justice Ajay Rastogi, Justice Aniruddha Bose, Justice Hrishikesh Bose and Justice C.T. Ravikumar [1] Case No. W.P.(C) No.-23 / 2016 Petitioner: Animal Welfare Board, PETA[2], Compassion Unlimited Plus Action, Federation of Indian Animal Protection
ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD V. UNION OF INDIA Read More »
Published On: 5th September, 2024 Authored By: Gauri Gupta University Institute of Legal Studies, Panjab University CITATION: AIR 1985 ALL 242 APPELLANT- Bata India Ltd. RESPONDENT- Pyare Lal COURT INVOLVED: Allahabad High Court FACTS: Bata India Limited, the plaintiff, is a well-known company that had a good reputation even before the trademark registration began in
Bata India Ltd. vs Pyare Lal & Co. Read More »
Published On: 5th September, 2024 Authored By: Farheen Linkedin Introduction In the case of Rajnesh v. Neha, on November 4, 2020, a division bench of the Supreme Court made up of Justices Indu Malhotra and Subhash Reddy established detailed rules governing maintenance payments in divorce situations. In the landmark case of, the Supreme Court of
Maintenance in Matrimonial Cases (Rajnesh v. Neha) Read More »
Published On: 5th September, 2024 Authored By: Pradnya Rahul Bankar RTMNU’s Dr. Ambedkar College of Law, Nagpur Introduction: A significant case in the Indian Constitution’s history was the Berubari Case of 1960. Regarding the Nehru-Noon Agreement, which was signed by the prime ministers of India and Pakistan, the President conferred with the Supreme Court of
In Re: The Berubari Union v. Unknown [AIR 1960 SC 845, 1960 3 SCR 250] Read More »
Published On: 5th September, 2024 Authored By: Disha Bajaj ILS Law College, Pune Case: K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra on 24 November 1961. 1962 AIR 605, 1962 SCR SUPL. (1) 567, AIR 1962 SUPREME COURT 605, 1962 2 SCJ 347 1964 BOM LR 488, 1964 BOM LR 488. Introduction The Nanavati case was
K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra Read More »
Published On: 5th September, 2024 Authored By: Rania Rifaya F Alliance University Linkedin FACTS: 1. The current lawsuit was started on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s literary work had been duplicated by the Defendant and used without his permission as the foundation for a web series, violating his copyright. 2. The Plaintiff’s primary arguments were
Sameer Wadekar & Anr. vs. Netflix Entertainment Services Pvt. Ltd & Ors. Read More »
Published On: 4th September, 2024 Authored By: Shirisha Pasepu University of Hertfordshire Issue The central issue in the Minerva Mills Ltd v Union of India case was the constitutionality of the 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, particularly Sections 4 and 55. These sections amended Article 31C and introduced Articles 368(4) and 368(5), which significantly
Minerva Mills Ltd v Union of India (1980) – A Critical Analysis using the IRAC Method Read More »
