Cyberbullying in the Digital Age: Are India’s Legal Remedies Sufficient?

Published on: 27th December 2025

Authored by: Nandhitha V N
Jeppiaar University

Abstract

The growth of digital communication and social media has transformed our interaction but it has also given rise to concerning new forms of harassment. Cyberbullying—the deliberate use of digital technology to harm, intimidate, or demean others—presents significant legal and social challenges in India. This paper explores the existing legal framework aimed at addressing cyberbullying, points out its deficiencies, and suggests reforms to improve digital safety. By examining case law, statutory provisions, and international standards, it assesses whether India’s legal system sufficiently protects victims of online abuse.

Introduction

The internet and social media have significantly influenced the 21st century. While these platforms provide exceptional opportunities for expression and connection, they also enable new forms of abuse. Cyberbullying, a type of cybercrime that uses digital tools to threaten, intimidate, or defame, has become a serious issue. Unlike traditional bullying that happens in physical spaces, cyberbullying transcends geographical limitations and can result in lasting psychological damage. With more than 900 million internet users in India, incidents of cyberbullying are increasing, particularly among adolescents and women. The absence of specific anti-cyberbullying legislation in India reveals a crucial gap in our digital legal framework. This paper evaluates the current legal remedies available in India and their effectiveness in tackling this pressing issue.

Defining Cyberbullying: Its Nature and Various Forms

Cyberbullying encompasses a range of harmful behaviours such as sending threatening messages, sharing private images without consent, creating fake profiles, spreading false rumours online, and engaging in trolling. While Indian law has not yet formally defined cyberbullying as a separate concept, many related cases are covered under different sections of the Information Technology Act of 2000 and the Indian Penal Code of 1860. The Information Technology Act of 2000 (IT Act) was created mainly to combat cybercrime and promote electronic commerce. It includes provisions designed to address issues associated with cyberbullying, such as:
• Section 67 prohibits the publication or transmission of obscene material in electronic formats.
• Section 66E addresses privacy violations concerning the capturing or sharing of private images.
• Section 72 focuses on breaches of confidentiality and privacy.
Furthermore, the Indian Penal Code of 1860 (IPC) provides remedies through:
• Section 354D, which deals with stalking, including online stalking.
• Sections 499–500, which pertain to defamation.
• Section 507, which addresses criminal intimidation through anonymous communication.
• Section 509, which pertains to actions that insult a woman’s modesty.
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act of 2012 (POCSO) makes online sexual harassment and grooming of minors a crime. Nonetheless, the absence of a comprehensive standalone law reveals a significant gap in India’s digital protection framework.

Judicial Interpretation and Case Study

Case Study: The Blue Whale Challenge (2017)
The controversy surrounding the Blue Whale Challenge revealed shortcomings in India’s digital policing efforts, as it coerced teenagers into self-harm and suicide. In S. Rajasekaran v. Union of India (2017), the Madras High Court mandated that the government block harmful online content and improve cyber awareness among youth. This case demonstrated the blurred boundaries between cyberbullying, psychological manipulation, and incitement to suicide.
Other Judicial Precedents:
• In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Supreme Court invalidated Section 66A of the IT Act, stressing that freedom of expression must be weighed against public order.
• In State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004), one of India’s first convictions for cybercrime occurred when an individual was found guilty of posting obscene content and harassing a woman online.

Comparative Legal Perspective

Several jurisdictions have enacted specific anti-cyberbullying laws:
• United Kingdom: Malicious Communications Act, 1988; Communications Act, 2003.
• United States: Many states have enacted specific laws to tackle cyberbullying.
• Australia: The Enhancing Online Safety Act of 2015 established an eSafety Commissioner to address online abuse.
In contrast, India depends on general criminal laws, resulting in inconsistent enforcement and insufficient protection for victims.

Challenges in the Indian Legal System

  1. Lack of a dedicated law.
  2. Gaps in enforcement and insufficient cyber forensic expertise.
  3.  Social stigma that results in under-reporting
  4.  Jurisdictional issues in cross-border cases.
  5. Limited international collaboration.

Recommendations

  1. Create a comprehensive Cyber Harassment and Online Safety Act.
    2. Create dedicated cyber safety units staffed with trained professionals.
    3. Initiate awareness programs that encourage responsible online behaviour.
    4. Establish support systems for victims, including online reporting options.
    5. Strengthen cross-border collaboration following the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime.

Conclusion

Cyberbullying is a multifaceted issue that intersects law, technology, and psychology. India’s existing legal framework provides some scattered solutions, but it falls short in addressing the persistent problems of online harassment. The constitutional protections of dignity and privacy outlined in Article 21 demand proactive legislative measures. A robust legal framework, combined with heightened judicial awareness and improved digital literacy, can help transform cyberspace into a space that empowers users rather than harming them.

References

  1. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 12.
  2. S. Rajasekaran v. Union of India (2017) Mad HC.
  3. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2004), Cyber Crime Cell, Chennai.
  4. Information Technology Act 2000 (India).
  5. Indian Penal Code 1860 (India).
  6. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 (India).
  7. UNICEF, Cyberbullying: What Is It and How to Stop It (2021).
  8. Communications Act 2003 (UK).
  9. Enhancing Online Safety Act 2015 (Australia).
  10. Budapest Convention on Cybercrime (2001).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top