Published On: 7th October 2026 Authored By: Vanshika Gupta Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU Case Details Case Title: State Bank of India v Union of India & Ors Citation: 2026 INSC 153; Civil Appeal No 1810 of 2021, along with connected appeals. Court: Supreme Court of India, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Bench: Justice P.S. Narasimha and […]
Case Summary: State Bank of India v Union of India & Ors Read More »
Published On: 7th October 2026 Authored By: Vanshika Gupta Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU ABSTRACT The way the Competition Commission of India handled those cancellation fees for Air India and IndiGo back in March 2026 highlights a huge gap between laws for competition and the rules designed to protect users. A complaint was made stating
Published On: 7th October 2026 Authored By: Pranav Raj Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU CASE DETAILS Case Title: ASF Buildtech Private Limited v Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited Citation: 2025 INSC 616: Civil Appeal No 5823 of 2025, arising out of SLP (C) No 21286 of 2024. Court: Supreme Court of India, Civil Appellate
Published On: 7th October 2026 Authored By: Pranav Raj Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU Introduction[1] India established its pre-packaged insolvency resolution process (PPIRP) through the 2016 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to provide businesses with a faster and less disruptive method of resolving corporate insolvency compared to traditional corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) methods. The
PRE-PACKAGED INSOLVENCY AS A PRIVATE EQUITY EXIT AND DISTRESSED-M&A ROUTE IN INDIA Read More »
Published On: 7th October 2026 Authored By: Pranav Raj Gitarattan International Business School, GGSIPU ABSTRACT The old way India handled merger control was predominantly dependent on thresholds for assets and turnover which created a real gap for regulators when high value digital companies were bought even if they had very little revenue or physical assets.
