Published On: 13th February, 2024 Authored By: Vedanti Wanjari Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur Linkedin INTRODUCTION The case made some major points that the weaker sections of society, such as the proletariat, linguistic and other minorities, and distant denizens from the far reaches of our country with its vast diversity, may well be the victims when

Published On: 13th February, 2024 Authored By: Gayathri Manoj Presidency University Linkedin Citation: AIR 1976 SC 1207. COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. JUDGES: RAY, A.N. (CJI), KHANNA, HANS RAJ, BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH, CHANDRACHUD, Y.V., BHAGWATI, P.N. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28 APRIL, 1976 DISSENTING JUDGE: HANS RAJ KHANNA FACTS OF THE CASE: In 1975 a significant turnin’ point in Indian political

Published On: 13th February, 2024 Authored By: Gayathri Manoj Presidency University Linkedin Case Citation: 2017 9 SCC 1 Petitioner(s): Shayara Bano and others Petitioner’s lawyers: Mr. Amit Chandha, Mr. Salman Khurshid Respondent(s): Union of India, All India Muslim Personal Law Board, Rizwan Ahmed, and Ministry of Women and Children Development Secretary Respondent’s lawyers: Mr. Mukul