Case Summaries Archives - Page 18 of 48

Minerva Mills Ltd v Union of India (1980) – A Critical Analysis using the IRAC Method

Leave a Comment / Case Summaries / thelegalquorum

Published On: 4th September, 2024 Authored By: Shirisha Pasepu University of Hertfordshire Issue The central issue in the Minerva Mills Ltd v Union of India case was the constitutionality of the 42nd Amendment to the Indian Constitution, particularly Sections 4 and 55. These sections amended Article 31C and introduced Articles 368(4) and 368(5), which significantly […]

Minerva Mills Ltd v Union of India (1980) – A Critical Analysis using the IRAC Method Read More »

Mohan Lal & Anr vs Grain Chamber Ltd., Muzaffarnagar & Ors.

Leave a Comment / Case Summaries, thelegalquorum / thelegalquorum

Published On: 3rd September, 2024 Authored By: Parigha Paygude VPM’S TMC Law College, Thane In the Supreme Court of India Petitioner: Seth Mohan Lal & Anr. Respondent: Grain Chmaber Ltd., Muzaffarnagar & Ors. Date of Judgement: 15 November, 1967 Bench: Shah, J.C. Facts: – The company was involved in “futures” trading in gur (a type

Mohan Lal & Anr vs Grain Chamber Ltd., Muzaffarnagar & Ors. Read More »

SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VS. CBI & ANR.

Leave a Comment / Case Summaries, thelegalquorum / thelegalquorum

Published On: 3rd September, 2024 AUTHORED BY: SALONI SHARMA Law College Dehradun Linkedin INTRODUCTION The right to life and personal liberty is enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, but it is not absolute and can be curtailed in national interest. But one cannot curtail right to liberty of a person unreasonably and

SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VS. CBI & ANR. Read More »

SHILPA MITTAL V. STATE OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. (2020)

Leave a Comment / Case Summaries / thelegalquorum

Published On: 3rd September, 2024 Authored By: Saijal Agarwal ICFAI LAW SCHOOL Linkedin FACTS- In this case, a juvenile, aged 16-18, stands accused of committing an act falling under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, which carries a potential sentence of life imprisonment or up to 10 years in prison and a fine. The

SHILPA MITTAL V. STATE OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. (2020) Read More »

YOUNG INDIAN LAWYER’S ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF KERALA (SABRIMALA CASE)

Leave a Comment / Case Summaries / thelegalquorum

Published On: 2nd September, 2024 Authored By: Avani Mahajan Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur CASE ANALYSIS YOUNG INDIAN LAWYER’S ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF KERALA[1] (SABRIMALA CASE) CITATION:2017 10SCC 689 Bench[2]: Chief Justice, Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra Backdrop: Sabarimala temple is located at Sabarimala in Pathanamthitta district of the South Indian state of Kerala.

YOUNG INDIAN LAWYER’S ASSOCIATION VS STATE OF KERALA (SABRIMALA CASE) Read More »