REGULATING SOCIAL MEDIA: THE BALANCE BETWEEN FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY

Introduction

Social Media , a new revolutionary leap in human’s life , breaking barriers and bringing the world to our fingertips and making the world more interconnected than ever. In the 21^st Century people cannot live without social media , and it can be rightly said that social media has become the new living to people’s life.  Social media with it’s different social networking sites like WhatsApp, Facebook , Instagram , X , etc. have been a very common platform for everyone all over the world. There were 5.24 billion social media users around the world at the start of January 2025, equating to 63.9 percent of the total global population. There is a famous saying by the Greek Philosopher Aristotle “Humans beings are social animals, they need to interact with other animals to satisfy their needs”. People always want to connect to the society in some way or the other. So Social Media is the new way of living for the People of 21^st Century.

Regulating Social Media: The Delicate Balance Between Freedom and Responsibility

Social media has emerged as a powerful force in the modern world, transforming the way people communicate, access information, and participate in public discourse. It has redefined the boundaries of free speech, enabling individuals to express their thoughts instantly and reach global audiences. However, with this unprecedented access to digital platforms comes the growing concern of misinformation, cyber threats, privacy violations, and the ethical responsibilities of both users and platform owners. As societies become increasingly reliant on social media for news, business, and personal interactions, the question of regulation becomes not just relevant but essential.

At its core, the debate over regulating social media revolves around two fundamental principles: freedom of expression and accountability. On one side, unregulated platforms can serve as breeding grounds for harmful content, fake news, online harassment, and even cybercrimes. Without adequate oversight, social media can be manipulated for political propaganda, the spread of hate speech, or financial fraud. On the other side, overregulation can lead to censorship, restricting the free flow of ideas and suppressing diverse viewpoints. Striking a balance between these opposing forces is one of the greatest challenges of the digital age.

Effective social media regulation requires a multi-faceted approach. Governments, technology companies, and civil society must collaborate to create policies that promote digital responsibility without compromising fundamental freedoms. This includes implementing transparent content moderation systems, improving algorithmic accountability, and establishing ethical guidelines that prevent the misuse of personal data. Moreover, educating users on digital literacy and responsible social media usage can empower individuals to navigate online spaces with awareness and discernment.

While social media has the potential to drive positive change by giving voices to marginalized communities and fostering global conversations, it also demands responsible governance. The key lies in developing regulations that prioritize transparency, fairness, and inclusivity while respecting the fundamental right to free speech. As technology continues to evolve, so must the policies that govern it ensuring that the digital world remains a space for innovation, connection, and meaningful discourse, rather than a battleground for misinformation and manipulation.

Background

India, with over 800 million internet users, is one of the largest markets for social media platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube. Social media has played a crucial role in shaping public opinion, influencing elections, promoting businesses, and raising awareness on social and political issues. However, alongside its benefits, the unregulated growth of social media has also led to fake news, online hate speech, privacy breaches, and political propaganda, making regulation a critical issue in the country.

Key Examples of Social Media Challenges in India

1. Misinformation and Fake News:
   • India has witnessed several instances where false information spread on social media led to violence. One major example is the WhatsApp lynching incidents (2017-2018), where fake messages about child kidnappers circulated widely, resulting in mob violence and killings in different states.
   • During the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation regarding remedies, vaccines, and lockdown rules flooded platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, and Twitter, creating panic and confusion.
2. Political Influence and Election Manipulation:
   • Social media has been extensively used by political parties for election campaigns and voter influence. During the 2019 General Elections, platforms like Facebook and Twitter were flooded with political propaganda, fake news, and targeted advertisements aimed at influencing voters.
   • The Cambridge Analytica scandal (2018) revealed that Indian voter data was used for political advertising, raising concerns about data privacy and election integrity.
3. Hate Speech and Religious Tensions:
   • India has faced numerous cases where social media posts have incited religious violence and communal riots. For example, in Bangalore (2020), a Facebook post that allegedly hurt religious sentiments led to violent riots and police action.
   • Twitter and Facebook have been criticized for allowing hate speech and extremist content to spread, sometimes leading to real-world consequences.

Types of Media

Media refers to various channels of communication used to convey information to the public. It plays a crucial role in shaping opinions, spreading knowledge, and entertaining audiences. Here are the main types of media:

1. Print Media

Print media is one of the oldest forms of communication and includes written or printed content distributed physically.

Examples:

• Newspapers (e.g., The Times of India, The Hindu)
• Magazines (e.g., India Today, Forbes)
• Pamphlets & Flyers (used for advertisements, political campaigns)
• Books & Journals (academic, fiction, non-fiction)

Impact: Despite the rise of digital media, print media remains relevant, especially for in-depth reporting and analysis.

2. Broadcast Media

Broadcast media transmits information through audio and video channels, reaching a vast audience.

Types:

• Television (TV) – News, entertainment, educational programs (e.g., NDTV, Doordarshan, BBC)
• Radio – FM/AM stations, podcasts (e.g., All India Radio, Radio Mirchi)

Impact: TV and radio remain powerful tools for mass communication, especially in rural areas with limited internet access.

3. Outdoor or Traditional Media

This type of media involves public advertisements and promotions displayed in physical locations.

Examples:

• Billboards & Hoardings (used for brand promotions)
• Posters & Banners (political campaigns, public awareness)
• Public Announcements (PA Systems) (used during elections, festivals)
• Transit Advertising (ads on buses, metro trains, taxis)

Impact: This media type is effective for local reach and brand awareness, especially in urban and semi-urban areas.

4. Digital Media (Social Media)

Digital media includes online platforms that provide news, information, and entertainment, excluding social networking sites.

Examples:

• News Websites & Blogs (e.g., Times of India, The Quint)
• Online Streaming Platforms (e.g., Netflix, YouTube for video content, Spotify for audio)
• E-books & Online Publications (Kindle, Google Books)
• Email Newsletters (corporate and news updates)
• Social Media( WhatsApp, Facebook, X,etc.)

Impact: Digital media is rapidly growing, providing instant access to information anytime, anywhere.

5. Film & Cinema Media

Films and documentaries are a significant medium for storytelling, entertainment, and awareness.

Examples:

• Bollywood & Regional Films (e.g., Hindi, Tamil, Telugu cinema)
• Documentaries (e.g., Wild Karnataka, India’s Daughter)
• Short Films & Indie Cinema (used for social issues, experimental storytelling)

Impact: Cinema influences culture, spreads awareness, and entertains millions globally.

Laws related to Social Media Law

1. FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIAL MEDIA REGULATION
2. Constitutional Protection under Article 19(1)(a)
   The Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). This right allows individuals to express their thoughts, opinions, and ideas freely, including through digital platforms like social media. It is considered a fundamental pillar of democracy, enabling citizens to participate in discussions, criticize the government, and share information.

However, this freedom is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.

1. Restrictions on Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(2)

While freedom of speech is fundamental, Article 19(2) permits the government to impose reasonable restrictions in cases where speech affects:

• Sovereignty and integrity of India
• Security of the State
• Friendly relations with foreign States
• Public order
• Decency and morality
• Contempt of court
• Defamation
• Incitement to an offense

These restrictions serve as the legal basis for social media regulations, ensuring that online speech does not lead to violence, misinformation, or national security threats.

2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ACT, 2000 & ITS ROLE IN SOCIAL MEDIA REGULATION
3. a) Section 66A (Struck Down) – Punishment for Offensive Online Content

• This section criminalized sending offensive, menacing, or false messages via electronic communication that could cause annoyance or inconvenience.
• Struck down by the Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), declaring it unconstitutional for violating freedom of speech (Article 19(1)(a)).

Example:

• Before 2015: Several people were arrested for posting critical comments on Facebook or Twitter under Section 66A.
• After 2015: The Supreme Court ruled that this law was vague and could be misused to suppress free speech.

1. b) Section 69 – Government’s Power to Intercept, Monitor & Decrypt Information

• Allows the Central or State Government to intercept, monitor, or decrypt any information in the interest of:
  • National security
  • Public order
  • Preventing incitement to offenses
• Platforms like WhatsApp & Signal oppose this provision, as it threatens end-to-end encryption and user privacy.

Example:

• The Indian government asked WhatsApp to enable “traceability” to find the first sender of viral misinformation. WhatsApp opposed it, citing privacy violations.

1. c) Section 69A – Power to Block Content in National Interest

• Empowers the government to block access to any information on social media in cases where it:
  • Threatens sovereignty and security of India
  • Affects public order
  • Encourages incitement to offenses
• Intermediaries (social media platforms) must comply with blocking orders or face penalties.

Example:

• In 2021, Twitter blocked over 500 accounts linked to the Farmers’ Protest after government orders under Section 69A.
• In 2022, the government banned 54 Chinese apps, including TikTok and PUBG, under this provision, citing national security threats.

1. d) Section 79 – Intermediary Liability & Safe Harbor Protection

• Protects social media platforms (intermediaries) like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram from liability for user-generated content if they follow government rules.
• However, they must remove unlawful content when ordered by authorities or risk losing protection.

Example:

• If a user posts defamatory content on Facebook, Facebook is not liable under Section 79 unless it fails to take action after being notified.

1. e) Section 67 – Punishment for Publishing Obscene Material

• Penalizes the publishing or sharing of obscene, sexually explicit, or offensive material online.
• Punishment: Up to 5 years imprisonment and a fine up to ₹10 lakh.

Example:

• Many pornographic websites have been banned in India under this section.

1. f) Section 66C & 66D – Identity Theft & Impersonation

• Section 66C: Punishes identity theft, such as stealing passwords, Aadhar numbers, or credit card details.
• Section 66D: Punishes impersonation using fake social media accounts or phishing scams.

Example:

• Fake social media accounts impersonating celebrities, politicians, or government officials for scams fall under these sections.

1. g) Section 66E – Violation of Privacy

• Punishes sharing of private images/videos of individuals without consent.
• Punishment: Up to 3 years imprisonment or a fine of ₹2 lakh.

Example:

• Non-consensual sharing of images is punishable under this section.

3. IT (INTERMEDIARY GUIDELINES AND DIGITAL MEDIA ETHICS CODE) RULES, 2021
4. Key Objectives of IT Rules, 2021

• Increase accountability of social media platforms
• Curb fake news, hate speech, and unlawful content
• Provide grievance redressal mechanisms for users
• Regulate OTT platforms and digital news portals

The IT Rules, 2021 are divided into three parts:

• Part I – Definitions
• Part II – Due diligence for social media intermediaries
• Part III – Code of ethics for digital news media & OTT platforms

2. Important Provisions of IT Rules, 2021

Rule 3 – Due Diligence by Intermediaries

All social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc.) must:

• Publish user agreements, privacy policies, and community guidelines.
• Inform users not to post unlawful content, including:
  • Defamatory, obscene, or pornographic material
  • Content threatening India’s sovereignty, security, and public order
  • Hate speech, misinformation, or incitement to violence

 If platforms fail to comply, they lose “safe harbor” protection under Section 79 of the IT Act.

Rule 4 – Additional Due Diligence for Significant Social Media Intermediaries (SSMIs)

Social media platforms with more than 50 lakh (5 million) users are classified as Significant Social Media Intermediaries (SSMIs). They have extra responsibilities:

1.Appointment of Compliance Officers

• Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) – Ensures compliance with Indian laws.
• Nodal Contact Person – Coordinates with law enforcement 24×7.
• Grievance Officer – Handles user complaints within 15 days.

2. Traceability of First Originator (For Messaging Apps like WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal)

• Platforms must identify the first originator of unlawful content when asked by authorities.
• Concerns: WhatsApp argues this violates privacy and end-to-end encryption.

3️. Automated Content Moderation

• Platforms must deploy AI-based tools to detect:
  • Child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
  • Rape, nudity, deepfake content

4️. Content Removal Timeline

• Unlawful content must be removed within 36 hours of receiving a legal order.

 Rule 5 – Voluntary Verification of Accounts

• Social media platforms must allow users to verify their accounts using government-issued IDs (e.g., Aadhaar, PAN).
• Verified users will receive a distinctive mark (similar to Twitter’s blue tick).

Rule 6 – Additional Obligations on Other Intermediaries

• The government can direct any social media platform, even if they don’t qualify as SSMIs, to comply with Rule 4 obligations in case of:
  • Misinformation affecting public order
  • Threats to national security

3. Regulation of OTT Platforms & Digital News Media (Part III)

Rule 7 – Code of Ethics for Digital News & OTT Platforms

OTT platforms (Netflix, Amazon Prime, Jio Hotstar) and digital news portals must:

• Self-classify content based on age suitability:
  • U (Universal)
  • U/A 7+, U/A 13+, U/A 16+
  • A (Adult)
• Implement parental controls and age verification mechanisms for A-rated content.
• Follow a three-tier grievance redressal mechanism:

Tier 1 – Internal grievance redressal by platform
Tier 2 – Self-regulatory body led by industry representatives
Tier 3 – Oversight by the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (I&B Ministry)

The I&B Ministry has the power to issue take-down orders for non-compliance.

4. Penalties for Non-Compliance

• Platforms losing Section 79 protection (can be held liable for user content).
• Blocking of platforms/websites under Section 69A of the IT Act.
• Legal action against offending intermediaries.

4. THE DIGITAL PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT, 2023 RELATED TO SOCIAL MEDIA REGULATION
5. Data Collection & Consent

Section 6 – Consent for Data Processing

• Social media platforms must obtain user consent before processing personal data.
• Consent must be clear, specific, and unambiguous.
• Users have the right to withdraw consent at any time.

Relevance: Prevents unauthorized data harvesting and ensures users have control over their information.

Section 7 – Deemed Consent

• In certain cases, users’ data can be processed without explicit consent, such as:
  • Legal compliance
  • Public interest or national security
  • Employment purposes

Relevance: While this section enables platforms to comply with the law, it also raises concerns about privacy and surveillance.

2. User Rights & Responsibilities

 Section 11 – Right to Information About Personal Data

• Users can demand details about their data collected by social media platforms.
• Platforms must provide transparency regarding how and why data is used.

Relevance: Protects users from unfair data practices and ensures transparency in data handling.

 Section 12 – Right to Correction and Erasure

• Users have the right to correct or delete their personal data from social media platforms.
• Platforms must provide easy mechanisms for users to exercise this right.

Relevance: Helps prevent misuse of personal data, identity theft, and harassment.

Section 13 – Right to Grievance Redressal

• If a user’s data rights are violated, they can file complaints against the social media platform.
• Platforms must respond to grievances within a fixed timeline.

Relevance: Empowers users against data misuse, privacy breaches, and content removal disputes.

3. Platform Responsibilities & Compliance

Section 8 – Data Security Obligations

• Social media platforms must implement strong security measures to protect user data.
• Any data breaches must be reported to the Data Protection Board.

 Relevance: Prevents leaks of personal data, financial fraud, and unauthorized access.

Section 9 – Data Breach Reporting

• If a social media platform suffers a data breach, it must:
  • Inform the Data Protection Board.
  • Notify affected users if the breach risks their personal security.

 Relevance: Ensures quick action in case of cyberattacks and unauthorized data leaks.

4. Special Protection for Minors on Social Media

Section 15 – Processing of Children’s Data

• Social media platforms cannot process the data of users below 18 years without parental consent.
• Platforms must use age verification mechanisms.

Relevance: Prevents child exploitation, cyberbullying, and targeted advertising for minors.

5. Penalties & Enforcement

Section 25 – Financial Penalties for Violations

• Heavy fines (up to ₹250 crores) for:
  • Data breaches
  • Non-compliance with consent rules
  • Failure to protect user privacy

 Relevance: Encourages platforms to comply with strict data protection laws.

Section 18 – Role of the Data Protection Board

• The Data Protection Board of India will investigate complaints, issue penalties, and oversee compliance.

Relevance: Acts as a regulator to hold social media platforms accountable.

Landmark Judgments Related to Social Media Regulation and Data Protection in India

1. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) – Right to Privacy Case

• Citation: (2017) 10 SCC 1
• Issue: Whether privacy is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution.
• Verdict: Privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21. Any data collection must be necessary, proportionate, and legal.
• Impact on Social Media: Strengthened arguments for data protection laws, impacting platforms like Facebook & WhatsApp.

2. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2018) – Aadhaar Case

• Citation: (2019) 1 SCC 1
• Issue: Whether Aadhaar can be mandatorily linked to private services, including social media.
• Verdict: Aadhaar cannot be compulsorily linked to social media accounts.
• Impact on Social Media: Prevented forced Aadhaar authentication for WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter.

3.Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – Internet Free Speech Case

• Citation: (2015) 5 SCC 1
• Issue: Constitutionality of Section 66A of the IT Act, which criminalized “offensive” online speech.
• Verdict: Struck down Section 66A as unconstitutional due to its vague and arbitrary nature.
• Impact on Social Media: Strengthened freedom of expression, preventing arbitrary arrests for online posts.

4. Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) – Internet Shutdown Case

• Citation: (2020) 3 SCC 637
• Issue: Legality of internet shutdowns affecting free speech.
• Verdict: Right to access the internet is protected under Article 19(1)(a). Shutdowns must be proportionate and justified.
• Impact on Social Media: Restricted government’s power to block social media during protests.

5. Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India (2018) – Fake News & Hate Speech Case

• Citation: (2018) 9 SCC 501
• Issue: Role of social media in spreading hate speech and mob violence.
• Verdict: Government must actively curb fake news & hate speech on social media.
• Impact on Social Media: Led to stricter platform accountability under IT Rules, 2021.

Conclusion

The regulation of social media in India is at a critical crossroads, where the right to freedom of expression, data privacy, and platform accountability must be carefully balanced. The judiciary has played a pivotal role in defining these boundaries, ensuring that laws uphold constitutional rights while addressing emerging digital threats.

Landmark judgments like Shreya Singhal v. Union of India have strengthened free speech, preventing arbitrary censorship, while cases like Puttaswamy v. Union of India have reaffirmed privacy as a fundamental right, influencing data protection laws. The Anuradha Bhasin case underscored that digital access is intrinsic to free expression, limiting indiscriminate internet shutdowns. Simultaneously, decisions in cases like Tehseen S. Poonawalla have highlighted the growing dangers of misinformation and hate speech, emphasizing platform accountability.

With the enactment of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, alongside evolving IT Rules, the Indian legal landscape is becoming more structured in governing online platforms. However, concerns remain about encryption policies, state surveillance, and the fine line between content moderation and censorship.

As technology continues to evolve, the challenge ahead is to create a regulatory framework that safeguards democratic values, ensures corporate responsibility, and protects individual rights. The future of social media governance will depend on striking a balance between digital freedoms and ethical regulation, ensuring that India remains an open yet accountable digital society.

 

 

References

1. Constitution of India art. 19(1)(a), https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
2. Constitution of India art. 19(2), https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
3. Constitution of India art. 21, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
4. Constitution of India art. 22, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
5. The Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India), https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
6. .Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008, No. 10, Acts of Parliament, 2008 (India), https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
7. Information Technology Act § 66A, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
8. Information Technology Act § 67, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
9. Information Technology Act § 69, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
10. Information Technology Act § 69A, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
11. Information Technology Act § 79, https://www.indiacode.nic.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
12. Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, Gazette of India, Part II, Sec. 3(i) (Feb. 25, 2021), https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
13. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, No. 29, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India), https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
14. Digital Personal Data Protection Act § 4, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
15. Digital Personal Data Protection Act § 7, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
16. Digital Personal Data Protection Act § 8, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
17. Digital Personal Data Protection Act § 9, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
18. Digital Personal Data Protection Act § 20, https://www.meity.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
19. General Data Protection Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2016/679, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj (accessed 19 February 2025).
20. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1 (India), https://main.sci.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
21. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1 (India), https://main.sci.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
22. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2019) 1 SCC 1 (India), https://main.sci.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
23. Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) 3 SCC 637 (India), https://main.sci.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
24. Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India, (2018) 9 SCC 501 (India), https://main.sci.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).
25. Facebook Inc. v. Union of India, (2020) W.P. (C) No. 194/2019 (India), https://main.sci.gov.in/ (accessed 19 February 2025).