Constitution

Close-up of hands holding colorful letters representing LGBTQ pride.

A Slippery Slope: How the 2026 Transgender Bill Breaks the Promise of Privacy

Published on: 11th June 2026 AUTHORED BY: PAIYYAVULA RAMYA NALSAR UNIVERSITY OF LAW Abstract The 2026 Amendment to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act raises urgent questions about the limits of state power and the preservation of individual freedom. By introducing mandatory medical board verification and eliminating self-identification as a criterion for recognition, the […]

A Slippery Slope: How the 2026 Transgender Bill Breaks the Promise of Privacy Read More »

A close-up black and white photo of the Lady Justice figurine with scales.

PASSIVE EUTHANASIA: CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY REVAMPED

Published on: 11th June 2026 Authored by: Soumava Banerjee WBNUJS, Kolkata Abstract: From the revolutionary judgement of the Supreme Court on 25 January, 1978 in the Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)[1], the ambit of one of the Fundamental Rights of the Golden Triangle, i.e., Article 21 has been widened many times to rationally

PASSIVE EUTHANASIA: CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY REVAMPED Read More »

A close-up view of a contract and pen on a wooden desk, ideal for business themes.

The Evolution of Good Faith in Commercial Contracts

Published on: 11th June 2026 Authored by: Samuel Xavier Oliveira De Montfort University Dubai Introduction: In recent times, the principle of good faith has become a significant aspect in modern day contract law. Often defined as the standards of honesty, integrity, fairness and fidelity, good faith has come to the forefront of contractual agreements between

The Evolution of Good Faith in Commercial Contracts Read More »

A kori bustard bird standing in dry savannah grass, showcasing its natural habitat.

Case Summary: M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2024) INSC 280

Published On: June 07, 2026 Authored By: Priyam Pratik Faculty of Law, University of Allahabad Case Details Full Case Name: M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.Citation: (2024) INSC 280; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 838 of 2019 with Civil Appeal No. 3570 of 2022Bench: Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, and

Case Summary: M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2024) INSC 280 Read More »

The Marital Rape Exception in India: A Constitutional Anomaly or Judicial Evasion?

Published On: June 06, 2026 Authored By: Anant Srivastava Kirit P. Mehta School of Law NMIMS Mumbai Abstract There is an idea that marriage can override consent, and Indian criminal law still seems to quietly accept it. Under the marital rape exception, a man who forces his wife into sexual intercourse is not treated as

The Marital Rape Exception in India: A Constitutional Anomaly or Judicial Evasion? Read More »

Scroll to Top