High Court

The Legal Quorum

Case Comment: Acceptance, Delay and Lapse- A Legal Study of Ramsgate vs. Montefiore”

Published on 15th July 2025 Authored By: Aarya Singh Chanakya National Law University, Patna INTRODUCTION The landmark judgment of Ramsgate Victoria Hotel Co. Ltd. vs. Montefiore[1] (1866) pirouettes around the lapse of the offer due to the passage of time. Section 2(a) of The Indian Contract Act, 1872[2] defines an offer as “When one person […]

Case Comment: Acceptance, Delay and Lapse- A Legal Study of Ramsgate vs. Montefiore” Read More »

Close-up of a wooden gavel on a desk, symbolizing justice and legal authority.

Case Summary of Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. vs The Union Of India And 2 Ors [AIR 2018 (NOC) 398 (BOM.)]

Published on 07th July 2025 Authored By: Kriti Arora Galgotias University Introduction This old order of the Bombay High Court, Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Others, was an examination of the constitutional validity of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, more popularly known as RERA. This

Case Summary of Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. vs The Union Of India And 2 Ors [AIR 2018 (NOC) 398 (BOM.)] Read More »

Close-up of a wooden gavel on a desk, symbolizing justice and legal authority.

Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. IKEY India Pvt. Ltd.

Published on 05th July 2025 Authored By: Treasy Nilopher Sastra Deemed University Tanjore Court: Delhi High Court Date of Judgment: December 26, 2024 Facts The case revolves around Inter IKEA Systems B.V., the owner of the globally renowned “IKEA” trademark, which is protected under Indian trademark law. IKEA alleged that an Indian company had started

Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v. IKEY India Pvt. Ltd. Read More »

Scroll to Top