judiciary

The Legal Quorum

Case Summary: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461

Published On: Novemeber 30th 2025 Authored By: Manyata Singh Maharaja Surajmal Institute, GGSIPU Case Title: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461 Citation: AIR 1973 SC 1461, (1973) 4 SCC 225 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: S.M. Sikri (CJI), J.M. Shelat, K.S. Hegde, A.N. Grover, A.N. Ray, D.G. Palekar, H.R. Khanna, […]

Case Summary: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461 Read More »

Case Summary: Donoghue v Stevenson, [1932] AC 562

Published On: Novemeber 30th 2025 Authored By: Gangarapu Chethana Sree VIT-AP University Court: House of Lords (United Kingdom) Bench: Lord Atkin, Lord Thankerton, Lord Macmillan (majority); Lord Buckmaster, Lord Tomlin (dissenting) Date of Judgment: May 26, 1932 Relevant Statutes/Key Provisions: Common law principles of negligence in tort (no specific statutes; draws on precedents like Heaven

Case Summary: Donoghue v Stevenson, [1932] AC 562 Read More »

The Legal Quorum

CASE SUMMARY: KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA (1973)

Published On: November 30th 2025 Authored By: Srishti Sinha School of Law, University of Mumbai, Thane sub-campus Case Title: Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala & Anr. Citation: AIR 1973 SC 1461; (1973) 4 SCC 225 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Largest constitutional bench ever in India consisting of 13 Judges: S.M. Sikri

CASE SUMMARY: KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA (1973) Read More »

judge, hammer, auction hammer, auction, verdict, law, dish, criminal law, justice, lawyer, regulation, paragraph, courthouse, auctioneer, jurisdiction, youth court, dsgvo, attorney, privacy policy, notary, negotiation, summons, judge, law, law, law, law, law, justice, lawyer, lawyer

HATE SPEECH VS. FREE SPEECH: A LEGAL BOUNDARY

Published on: 30th November 2025 Authored by: Honey Kumar CH. CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT This article examines the conflict between hate speech and free speech, presenting a significant challenge to both constitutional and legal frameworks. It requires a careful balance to safeguard individual expression while addressing issues such as discrimination, violence, and societal conflict.

HATE SPEECH VS. FREE SPEECH: A LEGAL BOUNDARY Read More »

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: A Landmark Victory for LGBTQ+ Rights in India

Published on: 28th November 2025 Authored by: Misbah Sayyed A.K.K. New Law Academy Citation: AIR 2018 SC 4321Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Chief Justice Dipak Mishra, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Indu MalhotraDate of Judgment: September 6, 2018 Relevant Provisions The case dealt with the following constitutional and statutory

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India: A Landmark Victory for LGBTQ+ Rights in India Read More »

Scroll to Top