law

The Legal Quorum

Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023)

Published On: 11th February, 2025 Authored By: Prachi Kumari Savitribai Phule Pune University Citations Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023) 4 SCC 529. Relevant provisions: Articles 324(2) of the Indian Constitution. Facts The case originated as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the process of appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election […]

Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (2023) Read More »

The Legal Quorum

LANDMARK JUDGMENT ON GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS: AIR INDIA VS. NERGESH MEERZA (1981)

Published On: 11th February, 2025 Authored By: Kesar Prakash Sukali Vivekananda Education Society College of Law TITLE AND CITATION Title: Air India Etc. Etc vs Nergesh Meerza & Ors. Etc. Etc on 28 August 1981. Equivalent citations: 1981 AIR 1829, 1982 SCR (1) 438, AIR 1981 SUPREME COURT 1829, 1981 LAB. I. C. 1313, (1981)

LANDMARK JUDGMENT ON GENDER EQUALITY AND EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS: AIR INDIA VS. NERGESH MEERZA (1981) Read More »

The Legal Quorum

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union Of India And Ors. (2000)

Published On: 11th February, 2025 Authored By: Anushka singh D.E.S. Navalmal Firodia Law College CITATION: Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India and Others 2000 (10 S.C.C. 664) FACTS: The Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India and Ors. case centres around the construction of the Sardar Sarovar Dam on the Narmada River, which faced

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union Of India And Ors. (2000) Read More »

THE MAXIMS OF EQUITY IN CONTEMPORARY LEGAL PRACTICE: Are they still relevant?

Published on 28th January 2025 Authored By: Priyanka Saha Amity University, Kolkata Abstract The concept of Equity originated in England, but over time, its relevance has transcended borders, becoming a cornerstone of justice systems worldwide. Equity does not oppose the law; instead, it complements it. When the law falls short of delivering fair and just

THE MAXIMS OF EQUITY IN CONTEMPORARY LEGAL PRACTICE: Are they still relevant? Read More »

The Legal Quorum

Bangalore Water-Supply & Sewerage Board, Etc. v. R.   Rajappa & Others

Published On: 28th January, 2025 Authored By: Atif Pathan Galgotias University Introduction/Background of the case There was no way for the parties to agree with the respondent’s argument that the Appellant had charged them for the misconduct and imposed irrelevant fines, which seemed completely irrational. The Appellant violated natural justice, as stated in the Respondent’s

Bangalore Water-Supply & Sewerage Board, Etc. v. R.   Rajappa & Others Read More »

Scroll to Top