Published On: 2nd May 2025 Authored By: Duvvuru Shiny Abraham Sri Eswar Reddy College of Law INTRODUCTION: Over the centuries, many dynasties have risen and fallen, but one constant has been the use of the death penalty as a method of administering justice. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, continues to raise complex concerns, particularly […]
Death Penalty in India: Debates and Judicial Trends Read More »
Published On: 2nd May 2025 Authored By: Rohith Kanth.R Chennai Dr Ambedkar Government Law College, Pudupakkam Abstract: Today, the greatest threat to our water resources undoubtedly comes from pollution. Although it is a problem all over the world, in developing countries, it is worse because of a large population, lack of finances, and inadequate scientific
WATER POLLUTION IN INDIA: LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND THE WAY FORWARD Read More »
Published On: 19th April, 2025 Authored By: Prachi Priyadarshini Madhusudan Law University INTRODUCTION: The landmark judgment in Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985 AIR 945) stands as one of the most significant rulings in Indian legal history, especially concerning the rights of Muslim women. This case centered on the issue of maintenance rights
MOHD. AHMED KHAN V. SHAH BANO BEGUM AND ORS. (1985) AIR 945 Read More »
Published on 19th April 2025 Authored By: Aishwarya Uniyal UPES INTRODUCTION Supreme Court and High Courts are constitutional courts and not mere criminal courts except in certain exceptional cases. The Supreme Court through its landmark judgments have served as a guardian for protection of fundamental rights of the individuals in order to prevent arbitrary arrest
ARNESH KUMAR V. STATE OF BIHAR 2014 8 SCC 273 Read More »
Published on 11th April 2025 Authored By: Nishu Singh Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi Parties Involved: Petitioner: Ushaben Navinchandra Trivedi and Anr. Respondent: Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir And Ors. Court: Gujarat High Court Citation: AIR1978GUJ13 Facts of the Case The appellant filed a suit in the city civil court, Ahmedabad, in 1978. The plaintiff claimed a
