Published on: 4th November 2025 Authored by: Duvvada Yathin Chowdary Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University Court: Supreme Court of India  Bench: M.H. Beg (CJI), Y.V. Chandrachud, V.R. Krishna Iyer, P.N. Bhagwat, N.L. Untwalia, S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, and P.S. Kailasam, JJ.  Date of Judgment: January 25, 1978  Relevant Statutes / Key Provisions Article 14 – […]
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597 Read More »
Published on: 03rd November 2025 Authored by: Sneha Raj Chanakya National Law University INTRODUCTION The 21st century is witnessing a digital era that enhances transactions, eases communication, and paves the way for development. However, it also carries unprecedented vulnerabilities. Cybercrimes encompass illegal activities carried out by using computers, the internet, or various digital equipment. It
CYBERCRIME AND DIGITAL POLICING: EFFICACY OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Read More »
Published on: 29th October 2025 Authored by: Shravani vishnu Reva University The landmark judgment in Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) declared instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) unconstitutional, striking a balance between Muslim women’s fundamental rights and religious freedom under Article 25 of the Constitution. Bench Composition Constitution Bench of five judges: Justice J.S. Khehar
Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) Read More »
Published on: 29th October 2025 Authored by: Akanksha Prajapati Shambhunath Institute of Law ABSTRACT Hate speech has become one of the most common and critical manifestations of social activity in the digital age. This article represents a critical analysis of the concept of free speech, hate speech in India. The study delves into free speech,
HATE SPEECH VS. FREE SPEECH: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL BALANCING ACT Read More »
Published on: 28th October 2025 Authored by: Aditi Arora University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun Secularism, the theory of separation of the organs of the State and religious institutions, is one of the pillar of India’s constitutional democracy. The members of the Constituent Assembly had dreamt of India as a polity of many, in which the State would be equally distant and neutral to all religions, taking neither side nor intervening randomly in matters of religion, except to the extent necessary for the reason of preserving public order,
SHOULD INDIA BE A SECULAR COUNTRY? Read More »
