The Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

ABSTRACT

This article explores the evolving role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), emphasizing their impact on legal frameworks and regulatory challenges. As AI continues to revolutionize various sectors, the necessity for structured legal regulation grows. This paper examines global legislative efforts and identifies the primary legal challenges concerning AI’s legal personality, civil and criminal liability, and ethical considerations.

1. INTRODUCTION

Artificial Intelligence represents one of the most groundbreaking technological advancements in modern history, offering numerous benefits across various industries. As AI evolves, discussions surrounding its legal regulation become more critical. The central debate revolves around whether AI should be classified as an object or a subject of law.

This paper explores early legislative efforts to regulate AI, analyzing key legal challenges and the complexities that arise. The research delves into defining AI’s legal personality, determining liability in cases of AI-caused damage, and addressing ethical concerns. By shifting the discussion to a legal framework, we aim to provide insights into the challenges AI presents to legal systems globally.

Various countries have initiated steps to develop AI-related legislation, though a unified legal definition remains elusive. The primary objective of these regulations is to establish a clear relationship between AI and its legal implications. This study employs a normative research approach, utilizing qualitative data analysis and comparative legal methods to assess the policies and frameworks governing AI.

This paper is structured as follows: first, it discusses the fundamental concept and importance of AI; second, it examines the legal evolution of AI across different jurisdictions; third, it addresses legal perspectives on AI’s legal personality and liability; and finally, it identifies future challenges and proposes potential solutions.

2. WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS IMPORTANCE?

Artificial Intelligence is a broad domain of computer science focused on developing machines capable of performing tasks traditionally requiring human intelligence (BUILTIN, 2021). AI encompasses cognitive functions such as problem-solving, reasoning, perception, and knowledge representation (HEATH, 2021).

The significance of AI lies in its ability to automate complex processes, eliminating the need for human intervention. AI is now integrated into various aspects of daily life, from self-driving cars and navigation systems to advanced communication tools and automated decision-making software (IRIZARRY-NONES; PALEPU; WALLACE, 2017, p. 5).

AI enables machines to learn from experience, adapt to new information, and execute human-like tasks (SAS, 2021). Its applications span multiple industries, including healthcare, finance, law, and manufacturing. AI-driven algorithms enhance efficiency, reduce human error, and accelerate data processing. As AI capabilities expand, ethical and legal concerns surrounding its deployment become increasingly significant (TEGMARK, 2021).

3. EVOLUTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACCORDING TO LEGAL FRAMEWORKS

The legal regulation of AI aims to establish policies that define its functionality, applications, and ethical considerations. The need for AI governance arises from its rapid development and potential risks, including privacy violations, liability issues, and ethical dilemmas. Some researchers warn that AI advancements could pose existential risks if left unregulated (ETZIONI; ETZIONI, 2017).

The First International Conference on AI and Law, held in Boston in 1987, marked a significant milestone in AI legislation (BENCH-CAPON; ARASZKIEWICZ; ASHLEY, 2012, p. 4). While AI-related legal discussions date back to the 1950s, this conference solidified AI’s role in legal discourse. The conference primarily focused on defining AI legally, establishing legal frameworks, and exploring AI’s potential applications in law. Notably, AI has since facilitated digital legal research through case databases and automated legal analysis (BENCH-CAPON; ARASZKIEWICZ; ASHLEY, 2012, p. 9).

3.1 LEGISLATIVE REGULATORY PROVISIONS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

South Korea

South Korea enacted the Intelligent Robot Distribution Development and Promotion Act in 2008 to promote sustainable AI growth (SOUTH KOREA, 2008). This legislation laid the groundwork for AI regulation, defining intelligent robots as autonomous mechanical devices capable of perceiving their environment. The act mandates a five-year development plan and established the Policy Council for the Robot Industry within the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy to oversee AI-related policies (KARELOV, 2018, p. 46).

United States

The U.S. approach to AI regulation emphasizes balancing innovation with fundamental rights. The National Strategic Plan on the Development and Research of Artificial Intelligence (2016) outlines AI research funding objectives to ensure AI’s sustainable growth across industries (UNITED STATES, 2016, p. 3).

The Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act (2019) represents Congress’s most comprehensive AI legislation, aiming to standardize AI development at the federal level. It defines AI as an autonomous system capable of learning from data without human supervision (UNITED STATES SENATE, 2019).

China

China has positioned itself as a global leader in AI through its Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan (2017). This plan prioritizes AI-driven economic growth and seeks to establish a robust legal and regulatory framework for AI governance (CHINA’S STATE COUNCIL, 2017, p. 5).

France

Since 2016, France has undertaken significant legal initiatives to regulate AI. The National Commission for Computer Technology and Civil Liberties was authorized to study AI’s social and ethical impact (WASHINGTON, 2019). France’s National AI Strategy (2018) aims to strengthen AI development while ensuring ethical oversight (MOLTZAU, 2018).

Conclusion

Artificial Intelligence continues to transform various industries, raising pressing legal and ethical questions. While countries have made strides in AI legislation, a unified legal framework remains absent. The primary challenges include defining AI’s legal personality, determining liability for AI-related damages, and addressing ethical concerns.

Future regulatory efforts should focus on creating international standards for AI governance, ensuring accountability, and promoting ethical AI development. As AI technology advances, legal frameworks must evolve to balance innovation with societal protection. Addressing these challenges proactively will ensure AI’s sustainable growth while mitigating potential risks.

References

1. .ABBOTT, R.; SARCH, A. Punishing Artificial Intelligence: legal fiction or science fiction. University of California, Davis, v. 53, n. 1, 2020.
2. Constitution of the Republic of Albania. 21 July 2016. Available at: Available at: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-REF(2016)064-e. Access in: 17 Dec. 2021.
3. BENCH-CAPON, T.; ARASZKIEWICZ, M.; ASHLEY, K. A history of AI and Law in 50 peapers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, v. 20, n. 3, p. 215-319, 2012.
4. Artificial intelligence. What is Artificial Intelligence? How Does AI Work? Introduction to al. Available in: Available in: https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence. Access in: 30 Nov. 2021.
5. CERKA, P.; GRIGIENE, J.; SIRBIKYTE, G. Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems?. Computer Law & Security Review, v. 33, n. 5, p. 685-699, 2017.
6. CHINA’S STATE COUNCIL. A Next Generation Artificial Intelligence Deveploment Plan. 20 July 2017. Available at: Available at: https://d1y8sb8igg2f8e.cloudfront.net/documents/translation-fulltext-8.1.17.pdf. Access in: 11 Nov.2021.
7. CHOPRA, S.; WHITE F. L. A Legal Theory for Autonomous Artificial Agents. [S.l.]: University of Michigan Press, 2011.
8. CLAUSSEN-KARLSSON, M. Artificial Intelligence and the External Element of Crime: an analysis of the liability problem. 2017. Available in: Available in: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1115160/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Access in: 12 Nov. 2021.
9. COENEN, F.; BENCH-CAPON, T. A Brief History of AI and Law. University of Liverpool, 2017.
10. CURTIS, L.; PLATTS, R. Trademark law playing catch – up with Artificial Intelligence?. 2020. Available in: Available in: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine_digital/en/2020/article_0001.html. Access in: 15 Dec. 2021
11. CYBERSECURITY and Infrastructure Security Agency Act of 2018. Available at: Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-15296/pdf/COMPS-15296.pdf. Access in: 23 Oct. 2021.
12. DATAFLAIR TEAM. Pros and Cons of Artificial Intelligence – a Threat or a Blessing?. 2019. Available in: Available in: https://data-flair.training/blogs/artificial-intelligence-advantages-disadvantages/. Access in: 19 Oct. 2020.
13. ETZIONI, A,; ETZIONI, O. Should Artificial Intelligence be regulated? Issues in Science and Tecnology, v. 33, n. 4, 2017.
14. GREENE, N.; HIGBEE, D.; SCHLOSSBERG, B. USA. In: BERKOWITZ, M. (ed.). AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2020. USA: Global legal Insights, 2020.
15. HALLEVY, G. The Criminal Liability of Artificial Intelligence Entities – from Science Fictions to Legal Social Control. Akron Law Journal, v. 4, n. 2, 2010.
16. HEATH, N. What is AI? Everything you need to know about Artificial Intelligence. 2021. Available in: Available in: https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-ai-heres-everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-intelligence/. Access in: 11 Sept. 2021.
17. IMRAN, M. Gradient Descent Optimizer – Regression Made Easy Using Tensor Flow. 2020. Available at: Available at: https://www.folio3.ai/author/mohammad-imran/page/4/. Access in: 22 June 2021.
18. IRIZARRY-NONES, A.; PALEPU, A.; WALLACE, M. Artificial Intelligence (AI). Boston: Boston University, 2017. Available at: Available at: https://www.bu.edu/lernet/artemis/years/2017/projects/FinalPresenations/A.I.%20Presentation.pdf. Access in: 11 Jan. 2020.
19. ISLAM, R. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Challenges. 2018. Available in: Available in: https://www.academia.edu/38813888/Artificial_Intelligence_and_Legal_Challenges. Access in: 25 Aug. 2021.
20. The Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence. 2019. Available in: Available in: https://www.iuricorn.com/the-legal-challenges-of-artificial-intelligence/. Access in: 27 July 2021.
21. KARELOV, S. V. Ethical and Legal Issues in Artificial Intelligence. International and Social Impacts of Artificial Intelligence Technologies, n. 44, 2018.
22. KINGSTON, J. K. C. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Liability. 2016. Available in: Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309695295_Artificial_Intelligence_and_Legal_Liability. Access in: 19 Aug. 2020.
23. LIMA, G. et al. Explaining the punishment gap of AI and Robots. 2020. Available in: Available in: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339972166_Explaining_the_Punishment_Gap_of_AI_and_Robots. Access in: 26 Sept. 2021.
24. MCLAUGHLIN, M. The National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act Could Strengthen U.S.A. AI Leadership. 2020. Available in: Available in: https://datainnovation.org/2020/03/the-national-artificial-intelligence-initiative-act-could-strengthen-u-s-ai-leadership/. Access in: 29 Nov. 2021.
25. MOLTZAU, A. French National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence. 2018. Available at: Available at: https://towardsdatascience.com/the-french-national-strategy-on-artificial-intelligence-c8c8fcfdace1. Access in: 17 Apr. 2021.
26. NATIONAL Commission for Computer Technology and Civil Liberties. Available at: Available at: https://www.donneespersonnelles.fr/la-cnil. Access in: 7 Oct. 2020.
27. NING, S.; WU, H. AI, Machine Learning and Big Data 2020: China. [S.l.]: Global Legal Insights, 2020.
28. RAHMAN, R. A.; HABIBULA, R. The criminal liability of artificial intelligence: is it plausible to Hitherto Indonesian criminal system? Legality, v. 27, n. 2, 2020.
29. OJ L 151, Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA (the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity) and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No 526/2013 (Cybersecurity Act). 07 June 2019. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/881/oj.
30. Artificial intelligence: what it is and why it matters. Available in: Available in: https://www.sas.com/en_us/insights/analytics/what-is-artificial-intelligence.html. Access in: 23 Oct. 2021.
31. SOUTH KOREA. Intelligent Robot Distribution Development and Promotion Act. Act No. 9014, Mar. 28, 2008. Available in: Available in: https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_mobile/viewer.do?hseq=39153&type=part&key=18. Access in: 23 Aug. 2020.