Arbitration Giants: Exploring the ICC, LCIA, and AAA Frameworks

Published On: 19th September, 2024

Authored By: Isha Patel
Dr. DY Patil Law College

Introduction

We live in a world today, where it is so easy to connect with a person living in a different country in just a matter of seconds. In this fast-paced world, it becomes easy to get a job, to start a company, to sell a product and whatnot. Thousands of people engage in commercial activities across national boundaries for a number of reasons. This may include, earning more profit, having access to a larger audience, or in the wish to be an international brand. However, sometimes due to unforeseen events, the parties to a contract may find themselves in a rift that only a person or institution other than themselves could solve. Oftentimes, domestic courts take a bit longer to adjudicate and settle disputes hence such entities and individuals resort to a mechanism of Alternative Dispute Resolution( ADR) popularly known as arbitration. By agreement of the parties, a disagreement is presented to one or more arbitrators who render a legally binding decision on the matter. This process is known as arbitration. Instead of going to court, the parties choose arbitration as a private conflict settlement process.[1] Arbitration offers various benefits including consensuality, neutrality, selection of arbitrator by the clients, confidentiality, and easiness to enforce the arbitral awards. Arbitration, even though now trending as an ADR mechanism, is not a new concept and in fact has ancient roots, though at that time it was informal and was primarily based on customs. When understanding the origin of the modern era of International Arbitration, began in the late 19th century with the establishment of institutions like the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the International Chambers of Commerce. The United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958), which makes it easier for arbitral awards to be recognized and enforced across national borders and increases the enforceability and efficacy of international arbitration, was the major development in the field of international arbitration.[2] In India, The Indian Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 codifies the laws relating to arbitration and is modeled after the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). When viewing from the lens internationally, there are various arbitral institutions that help resolve disputes in a fair and efficient manner. The question that arises within our minds is what is an arbitral institution? In concise words, “an arbitral institution is a service provider that administers proceedings under its arbitration rules.[3]” This article is a detailed analysis of various International Arbitration Institutions like The International Chambers of Commerce (ICC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), and the American Arbitration Association (AAA).

International Chambers of Commerce (ICC)

International Chambers of Commerce (ICC’s) International Court of Arbitration was established in Paris in 1923. Generally described as the world’s oldest and largest International Commercial Arbitration Institution, it is widely known for its less of a national character and is more inclusive than any other arbitral institution. This institution basically does not resolve disputes but instead hires a qualified arbitrator for a fair and impartial decision. It consists of an administrative body which regulates and supervises the work of the institution. In addition to supporting the Court in carrying out its duties, the Secretariat of the Court (the “Secretariat”) is in charge of managing ICC arbitrations on a daily basis. The Secretariat comprises more than eighty people. Approximately 50% of them work as lawyers. Eight case-management teams are formed out of them; each team is headed by a lawyer and consists of two or three deputy counsels in addition to administrative assistance.[4] This illustrates the thorough management of ICC and the way that every function and duty is delegated to a different person in order to guarantee the productivity and efficacy of the organization’s operations. The following are some grievances directed toward the organization:

  1. Perceived Bias – ICC is perceived as biased, particularly against African states demonstrating traits of neocolonialism and has also reduced the court’s reputation worldwide.[5]
  2. Prosecutorial Overreach and Underreach – Inconsistencies of ICC in overreaching in some cases and underreaching in some have led to allegations of ‘lawfare’.
  3. Expeditiousness and Fairness of Proceedings- The court has faced criticism for lengthy trials and the treatment of victims, including issues related to their participation and reparation processes​.
  4. Ineffectiveness in Handling Complex Political Situations- ICC has been criticized for its ineffectiveness in handling complex political situations in many instances.[6]
  5. Inconsistent Application of Justice-. The court’s changing stance on the prosecution of Saif Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi highlighted concerns about its ability to provide a stable and consistent application of justice​.[7]

Besides its criticisms, there are still reasonable grounds to believe that ICC will continue to be the preferred institution for various sophisticated commercial users.

London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)

The London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) was founded in the year 1892 making it one of the oldest arbitral institutions in the world. Initially, its services were restricted to the city of London but over time it expanded internationally on a large scale. It is widely known for its efficient arbitration services. The LCIA has its own set of arbitration rules that are periodically updated to reflect best practices in international arbitration[8]. The LCIA conducts its proceedings in multiple languages demonstrating its international nature. In fact, recently,  the institution has made a concerted effort to overcome perceptions that it is a predominantly English organization. To take steps in this direction, it has appointed 5 successive non-English presidents and its vice presidents include a number of non-English speaking practitioners.[9]  The LCIA handles a wide variety of cases, ranging from commercial disputes to investment treaty arbitrations. It has a diverse caseload that includes parties from different industries and regions around the world.[10] The LCIA also oversees the control of costs associated with arbitrations, making it a significant player in expense management during the dispute resolution process.[11][12] The LCIA is also well known for its fair and impartial dispute resolution which is one of the key necessities and qualities that clients look for when opting for arbitration. Other positive highlights include flexibility, experienced arbitrators, and efficient administration. These qualities are what make LCIA a very successful and renowned arbitral institution globally.

American Arbitration Association (AAA)

The American Arbitration Association is an arbitral institution founded in 1926 following the merger of two New York Arbitral Institutions- the Arbitration Society of America and the Arbitration Foundation. These two organizations combined their efforts and resources to create the AAA in 1926 with the goal of promoting arbitration and providing structured arbitration services. This institution is based in New York and has approximately 35 regional offices throughout the U.S.A. It is one of the leading arbitral institutions and reportedly handles one of the largest numbers of arbitral disputes in the world. The following points mention the key roles and functions of AAA:-

  1. Administration of Arbitration Cases- The AAA administers arbitration cases from start to finish i.e. from appointment of the arbitrator to case management and redressal issues.[13]
  2. Development of Arbitration Rules- The AAA develops and maintains a comprehensive framework of arbitration rules for smooth and efficient proceedings[14].
  3. Training and Certification – To ensure professionalism and to maintain its high-quality standards, AAA provides specialized training and certifications to potential arbitrators.[15]
  4. Providing ADR services – The AAA offers various ADR services, including mediation, dispute resolution boards, and other conflict management services.[16]

When considering AAA’s impactful and positive contribution to the field of arbitration, the following points highlight its incredible work:-

  1. Efficiency and Speed-  Arbitration through AAA is fast and quick compared to litigation services anywhere in the world.
  2. Confidentiality- The key highlight of AAA or any arbitral institution is that it strives to secure confidentiality and security of client matters, which makes it even more reliable to potential commercial clients.
  3. Expert Arbitrators – Training and certifications provided by AAA is a commendable job as there are various delicate cases that arbitrators have to decide on and hence ensuring that the arbitrators are highly skilled is what makes AAA distinguished from other arbitral institutions.
  4. Flexibility- The most likable aspect of AAA is that it tailors the proceedings according to the client’s needs and does not adhere strictly to any standard procedure thus enhancing flexibility and protecting the interests of the clients.

However, there are some crucial areas where AAA needs to focus on in order to enhance its effectiveness, audience reach and efficiency all at once, these include;-

  1. Cost- While arbitration as a process is supposed to be more cost-efficient than litigation, the fees charged by AAA are exceptionally high and hence unaffordable and inaccessible to a number of clients.
  2. Limited Appeal Rights- Arbitration decisions are generally final and binding with limited opportunities for appeal, which can be a disadvantage if a party is dissatisfied with the outcome. This may act as a drawback and one of the reasons why clients would not opt for AAA for their arbitration.
  3. Potential Bias- Non-US parties have sometimes been reluctant to agree to arbitration against US parties under any of the available versions of AAA rules, Dearing parochial predisposition, and unfamiliarity with international practice.[17]
  4. Enforceability Issues – While arbitration awards are generally enforceable, there can be challenges in enforcing them across different jurisdictions. For instance, what may be applicable in the U.S.A. might not be considered legal or valid across any other jurisdiction thus creating problems for international clients who approach AAA with their specific matters in hand.

Conclusion

When analyzing international arbitral institutions like ICC, LCIA, and AAA, we deeply understand their importance on the international platform and their role in promoting arbitration as a reliable and preferred ADR mechanism. Each institution brings unique strengths and approaches to arbitration, contributing to the robustness and flexibility of global dispute resolution mechanisms.

The ICC, which is by far one of the oldest arbitral institutions, is a large and comprehensive institution consisting of various departments that make its administration easy, efficient, and quick. It is also widely known for its inclusivity- both in clients as well as officers in the institution. Some key areas that require extensive work include perceived bias, prosecutorial overreach and underreach, fairness of proceedings, efficiency in handling complex political situations, and inconsistency in the application of justice. ICC still remains one of the most preferred arbitral institutions, especially for commercial clients.

When learning about the roles and functions of LCIA, we understand what makes it one of the most popular arbitral institutions in the world. Its step-by-step approach with an emphasis on procedural efficiency and the appointment of highly qualified arbitrators makes its services renowned and famous. Its recent efforts to overcome perceptions of it being an ‘all English’ institution have been proven significant in improving the institution’s image internationally. The LCIA’s approach is particularly beneficial for parties seeking a straightforward and efficient resolution of disputes without compromising on quality. Its rules provide flexibility in procedure, allowing parties to tailor the process to their specific needs.

Further, AAA’s strong domestic presence in the U.S.A. makes it one of the leading arbitral institutions in the world. The AAA’s extensive training and certification programs ensure a high standard of professionalism among arbitrators and mediators. Its focus on education and the development of arbitration practices contributes to the overall advancement of the field, moreover, its role in setting industry standards through its rules and guidelines ensures that arbitration processes are conducted fairly and transparently.

However, challenges such as costs, potential biases, and enforceability issues must be continually addressed to maintain the effectiveness and fairness of the arbitration process. For instance, the costs associated with arbitration can sometimes be prohibitive, particularly for smaller businesses. Potential biases, especially perceptions of favoritism towards repeat clients, need to be mitigated through strict adherence to ethical standards and transparency in arbitrator appointments. Enforceability issues, particularly across different jurisdictions, require ongoing attention to ensure that arbitration awards are respected and implemented.

India has significant and tremendous potential to be the next arbitration hotspot of the world. With emerging talents lawyers and advocates, there is a strong possibility of ADR mechanisms especially arbitration blooming in the Indian subcontinent. The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, and subsequent amendments have streamlined arbitration procedures and reduced court intervention, thereby enhancing the efficiency of arbitration in India. Key highlights of arbitration in India include the establishment of the Arbitration Council of India to promote and encourage arbitration, and the emphasis on institutional arbitration to ensure consistency and professionalism in arbitral proceedings.[18]

References:

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization, What is Arbitration?, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/arbitration/what-is-arb.html.

[2] Ishita Mohanty, International Arbitration: Meaning, Types, Reasons for Popularity, and More, iPleaders (Apr. 19, 2023), https://blog.ipleaders.in/international-arbitration/#Evolution_of_international_arbitration.

[3] MoloLamken LLP, What Are Arbitral Institutions, and Why Do They Matter?, MOLOLAMKEN, https://www.mololamken.com/knowledge-what-are-arbitral-institutions-and-why-do (last visited July 24, 2024).

[4] Clifford Chance LLP, Introduction to ICC Arbitration, CLIFFORD CHANCE, https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2012/12/introduction-to-icc-arbitration.pdf (last visited July 24, 2024).

[5] Carsten Stahn, How Fair Are Criticisms of the ICC?, OUPBLOG (July 15, 2021), https://blog.oup.com/2021/07/how-fair-are-criticisms-of-the-icc (last visited July 24, 2024).

[6] International Criminal Justice Today, The ICC’s Fundamental Design Flaws Have Only Become More Evident, INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE TODAY, https://www.international-criminal-justice-today.org (last visited July 24, 2024).

[7] D+C Development and Cooperation, Misguided Criticism, D+C DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION, https://www.dandc.eu (last visited July 24, 2024).

[8] LCIA, About LCIA, LCIA, https://www.lcia.org/About/Introduction.aspx (last visited July 24, 2024).

[9]International Arbitration, International Arbitration Institutions / Different Forums, INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, https://www.internationalarbitration.in/areas/forums.html (last visited July 24, 2024).

[10] LCIA, About LCIA, LCIA, https://www.lcia.org/About/Introduction.aspx (last visited July 24, 2024).

[11]https://jusmundi.com/en/document/publication/

[12]https://www.monarchsolicitors.com/international/international-and-cross-border-disputes/london-court-of-international-arbitration

[13] American Arbitration Association, Arbitration, available at https://www.adr.org/Arbitration.

[14] American Arbitration Association, Arbitration Rules, available at https://www.adr.org/Rules.

[15] American Arbitration Association, Education Services, available at https://www.adr.org/Education.

[16] American Arbitration Association, Services, available at https://www.adr.org/Services.

[17] International Arbitration, International Arbitration Institutions / Different Forums, INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, https://www.internationalarbitration.in/areas/forums.html (last visited July 24, 2024).

[18] Ministry of Law and Justice, Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, available at https://legislative.gov.in/actsofparliamentfromtheyear/arbitration-and-conciliation-amendment-act-2015.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top