Close-up view of a mouse cursor over digital security text on display.

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India

Published on: 09th October 2025 Authored by: Janvi Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Nine-Judge Constitution BenchDate Decided: August 24, 2017 Introduction Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.), a former judge of the Karnataka High Court, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme. The petition […]

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India Read More »

Scrabble tiles spelling 'LAW' on a wooden table, symbolizing connections to education and legality.

Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India, 1989 SCC (2) 540

Published on: 09th October 2025 Authored by: Jahnavi Raghu PES University Introduction The case of Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India arose from one of the world’s worst industrial disasters—the Bhopal Gas Tragedy of December 1984. The legal battle that ensued raised fundamental questions about corporate liability, transnational legal jurisdiction, and adequate compensation for

Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India, 1989 SCC (2) 540 Read More »

Lady Justice figurine on wooden table in dimly lit room symbolizes law and fairness.

MANEKA GANDHI v. UNION OF INDIA (1978)

Published on: 09th October 2025 Authored by: Shivani Verma Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi Respondent: Union of India and Others Citation: (1978) 1 SCC 248; AIR 1978 SC 597 Date of Judgment: 25 January 1978 Bench: 7-Judge Bench (M.H. Beg CJ, Y.V. Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer, N.L. Untwalia, S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, and P.S. Kailasam JJ) FACTS OF THE CASE

MANEKA GANDHI v. UNION OF INDIA (1978) Read More »

Close-up of a wooden gavel on a desk, symbolizing justice and legal authority.

Cox and Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2023)

Published on: 08th October 2025 Authored by: Raj Sanjay Mitra Faculty of Law, University of Delhi Supreme Court Holding: The Supreme Court preserved the “group of companies doctrine” in Cox & Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., holding that non-signatory parties may be bound by an arbitration agreement if their actions, interactions with the

Cox and Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2023) Read More »

Beyond the Womb: Analyzing the MTP Amendment of 2021 and the Evolving Jurisprudence on Bodily Autonomy in India

Published On: October 7th 2025 Authored By: Dheepshika M Chennai Dr Ambedkar Government Law College, Pudupakkam Abstract Reproductive rights, a cornerstone of personal liberty and bodily autonomy, have been a complex and evolving legal and social issue in India. While these rights encompass both men and women, the legal framework in India, particularly through the

Beyond the Womb: Analyzing the MTP Amendment of 2021 and the Evolving Jurisprudence on Bodily Autonomy in India Read More »

Scroll to Top