Published on 05th July 2025 Authored By: Nithya LR K.L.E. Law College, Bengaluru Facts: Parties Involved: The complainants, Mr. Danvir Nandal and Mr. Deepak Nandal, who lived in Jawahar Nagar, Sonepat, Haryana, made a deal with the Delhi-based real estate firm Parsvnath Developers Ltd. The commercial store in Sonepat’s “Parsvnath City Centre” development is at […]
Danvir Nandal and Anr vs. Parsvnath Developers Ltd. Read More »
Published on 04th July 2025 Authored By: Himanshi Bansal Lloyd Law College Abstract The case of Shrimati Shantabai v. State of Bombay (1953) is an interpretation of property rights under Article 19(1)(f) of the Indian Constitution (since repealed). The nature of rights in trees growing on leased forest land. The article is dedicated to looking
Shrimati Shantabai v. State of Bombay (1958) Read More »
Published on 04th July 2025 Authored By: Aashna Malik Maharaja Surajmal Institute Abstract The case comment has dealt with the Grund legend Judith von A.K. Roy v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 1126 (1982), which engages two important themes-affording a generous interpretation of the ordinance-making power of the executive under Article 123 of the
A.K. Roy v. Union of India AIR 1982 SC 1126 Read More »
Published on 04th July 2025 Authored By: Iffat Zehra St Joseph’s College of Law Facts of the case: It was a historic moment for the constitution in India, and in fact, for the Supreme Court in India that reaffirmed LGBTQ rights within the country, when it was attended by the case of Navtej Singh Johar
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) 10 SCC 1 Read More »
Published on 1st July 2025 Authored By: Mahi Srivastava VIPS-TC INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court in this case reaffirmed the social welfare objective of Section 125 of CRPC, emphasizing that the provision is not meant to punish or deteriorate any marriage but to protect vulnerable sections, especially women and children from financial destitution. It manifested the
SMT. N. USHA RANI AND ANR. VERSUS MOODUDULA SRINIVAS, 2025 SC Read More »
