Published On: November 13th 2025 Authored By: Adv. Heena Bedi Janhit College of Law, CCSU, Meerut Case Name: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India Citation: (2015) 5 SCC 1 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman Date of Judgment: March 24, 2015 Case Type: Writ Petition under Article […]
Case Summary: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) Read More »
Published On: November 13th 2025 Authored By: Hariom Awasthi Shri Ram Institute of Law INTRODUCTION The Constitution of India, enacted in 1950, represented a precarious balance between Parliamentary supremacy and constitutional supremacy. A key difference from the British Parliament, which is recognized to possess unlimited legislative powers, was that the Indian Parliament was bound by
Case Summary: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225 Read More »
Published On: November 13th 2025 Authored By: Elakkiya G Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: A.N. Ray, C.J., H.R. Khanna, J., K.K. Mathew, J., M.H. Beg, J., Y.V. Chandrachud, J. Date of Judgment: 7 November 1975 Relevant Statutes / Key Provisions: Article 329(b), Article 368, Article 14, Article 19,
Case Summary: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) Supp SCC 1: AIR 1975 SC 2299 Read More »
Published on: 09th November 2025 Authored by: Akash Pydi VIT-AP University Court: CBI special Court, Hyderabad Bench: Samudrala Govindarajulu, B. Prakash Rao, A. Gopal Reddy Date of judgement: April 5, 2015 Facts: Ramalinga Raju who was the chairperson of Satyam computer Services had established the Satyam computers in 1987, which grew into one of the
CBI v. B. RAMALINGA RAJU AND OTHERS Read More »
Published On: Novemeber 9th 2025 Authored By: Nameera Iqbal Sultan-ul-uloom College of law, affiliated to Osmania University Abstract Judicial accountability is often described as the cornerstone of judicial integrity, yet in India it remains one of the most debated constitutional questions. This article explores the Indian judiciary’s accountability mechanisms, their shortcomings, and the reforms urgently
