Published on 5th April 2025 Authored By: Sushree Sriya Bihari Madhusudan Law University Judges– P. Sathasivam, C.J.I., B.S. Chauhan, Ranjana Prakash Desai, Ranjan Gogoi and S.A. Bobde, JJ. Decided on: 12.11.2013 Citations- AIR 2014 Supreme Court 187, MANU/SC/0157/2012 FACTS OF THE CASE A writ petition was filed before the supreme court of India under Article 32 […]
LALITA KUMARI VS. GOVT. OF U.P [W.P.(Crl) No; 68/2008] Read More »
Published on 5th April 2025 Authored By: Sahasra Reddy IFHE Hyderabad FACTS OF THE CASE In this case, the petitioner, Sri Tarsem Singh, owned 48 kanals 11 marlas of agricultural land in village Panjetha, Patiala. On May 20, 1988, he entered into a contract with the respondent, Sri Sukhminder Singh, for the sale of this land
TARSEM SINGH Vs SUKHMINDER SINGH Read More »
Published on 5th April 2025 Authored By: Jay Laxmi Shukla United University ABOUT THE CASE CITATION : 1979 AIR 1868 1980 SCR (1) 668 1979 SCC (4) 260 CASE NO: Writ Petition No. 743 of 1979 PETITIONER: C. B. MUTHAMMA RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 17 September, 1979 BENCH : V.R. Krishnaiyer,
C. B. MUTHAMMA vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Read More »
Published on 5th April 2025 Authored By: Palak Mahajan Guru Nanak Dev University INTRODUCTION Supriyo vs. Union of India is a leading case which deals with the right of marriage of LGBTIQA + community. The Supreme Court of India did not resolve the problem of same sex marriage and left it on legislature to frame laws
Supriyo@ Supriya Chakraborty vs. Union of India Read More »
Published on 9th March 2025 Authored By: MANTASHA KHAN Shree L.R. Tiwari college of law Introduction In Indian society, marital rape—a horrific affront to a woman’s bodily autonomy and dignity—remains a widespread but mostly unseen problem. Often hailed as a sacred institution, marriage’s sanctity is used as an excuse to oppress and take advantage of
Legal Gaps and The Need for Reform regarding Marital Rape Read More »
