Published on: 16th November 2025 Authored by: Shivangi Nandi Amity Law School, Noida (AUUP) Case Title: Celir LLP v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) (P) Ltd 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1209 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Three bench judges Date of Judgement: 21.09.2023 Relevant provisions: Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 Introduction: The Celir LLP […]
Case Summary of CELIR LLP v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt Ltd Read More »
Published on: 15th November 2025 Authored By: Meetali Kothari Banasthali Vidyapith Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Kuldip Singh, Justice Faizan Uddin, and Justice K. Venkataswami Date of Judgment: 28th August, 1996 Relevant Statutes/Key Provisions: Article 21 of the Constitution of India and section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Brief Facts: A
VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM VS UNION OF INDIA, (1996) 5 SCC 647 Read More »
Published On: November 13th 2025 Authored By: Samruddhi Pawar ILS Law College Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: Chief Justice J.S Verma, Justice Sujata V. Manohar, Justice B. N. Kirpal. Date of Judgment: 13 Aug 1997. Relevant Provisions/ Statutes: Constitution – Articles 14 (equality), 15 (no sex-based discrimination), 19(1)(g) (right to profession), 21 (life &
Case Summary: Vishakha and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011 Read More »
Published On: November 13th 2025 Authored By: Adv. Heena Bedi Janhit College of Law, CCSU, Meerut Case Name: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India Citation: (2015) 5 SCC 1 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice J. Chelameswar and Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman Date of Judgment: March 24, 2015 Case Type: Writ Petition under Article
Case Summary: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) Read More »
Published On: November 13th 2025 Authored By: Hariom Awasthi Shri Ram Institute of Law INTRODUCTION The Constitution of India, enacted in 1950, represented a precarious balance between Parliamentary supremacy and constitutional supremacy. A key difference from the British Parliament, which is recognized to possess unlimited legislative powers, was that the Indian Parliament was bound by
Case Summary: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225 Read More »
